The Democratic left bets it can win more by working with the House Speaker. That could cost them.

By Katya Schwenk, Luke Goldstein, and Freddy Brewster, The Lever

At the Brooklyn election-night victory party this past June for insurgent New York congressional candidate Claire Valdez, the crowd was jubilant — until a familiar face appeared on a screen at the bar: Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, the Democratic minority leader.

Hakeem Jeffries speaking at the opening day of 118th Congress
U.S. government, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

The crowd erupted in boos at the sight of the congressman, who represents a nearby district. “You’re next,” attendees cried. Though they were on Jeffries’ home turf, the crowd was ready to unseat the party leader and the corporate-backed political machine that, in their eyes, he represented.


As primary elections in New York and beyond rejected establishment Democrats and sent a new generation of insurgents toward Congress, voters have continued to sour on Jeffries. According to an October poll of likely voters in two swing states and 11 other districts across the country, a plurality of Democrats say they don’t want Jeffries as speaker should their party regain control of the House.

But now, days from a general election that is increasingly likely to deliver the chamber to Democrats, progressive politicians and strategists tell The Lever there is no organized effort to field an alternative. On the contrary, Jeffries is poised to take the gavel, which will ultimately require help from the insurgent faction promising to challenge his center-left agenda.

Why are progressives, fresh off victories against the Democratic establishment, falling in line behind its leader before the midterm elections have even happened?

Read More