In recent days the Vice President has quickly ditched some of her boldest initiatives, needlessly making herself look unprincipled.
By Alex Skopic and Nathan J. Robinson, Current Affairs
Kamala Harris has been renouncing progressive positions one-by-one. During her short-lived 2019 presidential campaign, Harris was a supporter of single-payer healthcare, a fracking ban, and a federal jobs guarantee. No longer. On July 26th, a campaign official told the Hill that Harris “will not seek to ban fracking if she’s elected,” even though she had previously said there was “no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.” The following day, CNN reported that “the vice president no longer supports a single-payer health care system,” despite having co-sponsored Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All bill back in 2017. And on July 31, a Washington Examiner exclusive revealed that Harris has “changed her position” on a federal jobs guarantee—a component of the Green New Deal she backed in 2019—and no longer supports that either.
This is bad politics. In the 2004 presidential election, one of the dominant charges against John Kerry was that he was a “flip-flopper,” meaning he had opportunistically changed his positions for political convenience. (Republicans even made actual flip-flops listing the issues he’d been on both sides of: “For” on the left foot, “Against” on the right.) Brazenly changing your positions like this implies that you don’t actually believe in the things you say you believe in, and makes it very hard for voters to trust that what you’re saying at any given time is what you truly think.

Moreover, moving to the right on policy will not prevent Trump and his proxies from attacking Harris as “dangerously liberal,” a line they’ve already started using. This is a lesson Democrats should have learned in the Obama years. No matter how much Barack Obama tried to portray himself as a reasonable centrist and make compromises with Republicans, he was still attacked as a “socialist” whose healthcare plans would lead to “death panels.” Today, the GOP is not going to suddenly say “Well, I guess we should stop attacking Harris as a radical.” But her abrupt U-turns on policy will allow them to deploy a second line of attack, namely that she’s untrustworthy and doesn’t keep a consistent position on anything, which wouldn’t be wrong.
Recent Posts
Dems Demand Answers as Trump Photo Disappears From DOJ Online Epstein Files
December 21, 2025
Take Action Now “What else is being covered up?”By Brett Wilkins, Common Dreams Congressional Democrats on Saturday pressed US Attorney General…
Elon Musk Is Vowing Utopia Driven by AI and Robotics. Bernie Sanders Has a Few Questions
December 20, 2025
Take Action Now “I look forward to hearing about how you and your other oligarch friends are going to provide working people with a magnificent life…
U.S. Military Willing To Attack “Designated Terrorist Organizations” Within America, General Says
December 19, 2025
Take Action Now “If I had no concerns and I was confident in the lawful order, I would definitely execute that order.”By Nick Turse, The……
DOJ Won’t Meet Friday Deadline To Release All The Epstein Files
December 19, 2025
Take Action Now The delay means the White House is in apparent conflict with a law President Donald Trump signed in November.By Gregory…




